<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mu-mon-kan &#187; stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jungshadow.com/blog/category/stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jungshadow.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Gateless Barrier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And so it goes . . .</title>
		<link>http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/11/02/and-so-it-goes/</link>
		<comments>http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/11/02/and-so-it-goes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jared</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/11/02/and-so-it-goes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just depresses me. Others can draw their own conclusions, but it seems to break scientific integrity to have the government so involved. How do they know how to best handle the information? Are they qualified? I&#8217;m guessing, no. Currently Rocking Out To: Ballad of Nice &#38; Easy &#8211; Gomez]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,72057-0.html?tw=rss.index" title="Scientists: Bush Muzzled Research">This</a> just depresses me.</p>
<p>Others can draw their own conclusions, but it seems to break scientific integrity to have the government so involved.  How do they know how to best handle the information?  Are they qualified?  I&#8217;m guessing, no.</p>
<p><strong>Currently Rocking Out To:</strong> <em>Ballad of Nice &amp; Easy</em> &#8211; <a href="http://www.gomeztheband.com" title="One of my favs">Gomez</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/11/02/and-so-it-goes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hope for Humanity?</title>
		<link>http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/09/20/hope-for-humanity/</link>
		<comments>http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/09/20/hope-for-humanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jared</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pandas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jungshadow.com/blog/2006/09/20/hope-for-humanity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case everyone was thinking there was hope for humanity, think again. Drinking and pandas do not mix.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case everyone was thinking there was hope for humanity, <a title="You have got to be kidding me" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/5364058.stm">think again</a>.</p>
<p>Drinking and pandas do not mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jungshadow.com/blog/2006/09/20/hope-for-humanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

