Mu-mon-kan

I’m not sure how I feel about this. There’s something unsavory about it.

Currently Rocking Out To: Jah Work - Ben Harper

According to this press release from Creekstone Farms, the USDA denied them access to the necessary kits that test for BSE or Mad Cow Disease. Anyone want to speculate why?

. . . which isn’t the best news tonight since I’m slated to go to NY and visit my girlfriend. It does make me happy that I get to use the word inclement in a sentence, though. Such as:

My flight was delayed due to inclement weather.

Good word.

Currently Rocking Out To: Cornerman - St Thomas

I understand the need to accommodate people and their various diablities, but, perhaps I’m being judgemental or I’ve watched too much Mind of Mencia, but I’m not sure if it’s entirely healthy in some cases. You can form your own opinions on this, but, in any case, check out these products.

Currently Rocking Out To: Caring Is Creepy - The Shins

This is a cool little link for those who love ASCII images.

Check it out. It’s fun :)

Currently Rocking Out To: The Scientist - Coldplay

So I now have w.bloggar set up. Looks useful, but there are a few gripes (aesthetically speaking . . . I’m picky.) Maybe I’ll blog a little more now that it’s more convenient.

Please don’t hold your breath :)

Currently Rocking Out To: Somewhere A Clock Is Ticking - Snow Patrol

OK . . . I understand the hype and fascination with Web 2.0–which, incidentally, is an unfortunate name since the web itself hasn’t really evolved, just the flavor of applications being run on it, but I guess you have to market it somehow–but I feel the interactivity is being used for trendy, unnecessary, inaccessible, and, sometimes, annoying purposes. I’m constantly inundated with flashing widgets with drag-and-drop functionality for . . . what purpose? Do I go to a website to play with the widgets? Maybe some, but, most of the time, no. Does this functionality benefit everyone? After listening to the EO Webcast today, these thoughts plagued me throughout the day. A great deal of this new technology is used for it’s slick “wow” factor and much of it that could improve the site’s accessibility falls by the wayside. Sure, I can make the site cool for 85% of the world . . . but what does that make the site for the other 15? I know that I sometimes fall prey to time constraints in my own applications. If I don’t have time to make it 508 accessible, then I skip that step. However, I am always XHTML and CSS compliant. Hopefully, that’s half the battle.

Simplicity is not a bad thing. I try to design the way I live. Objects don’t end up in my house unless they have a functional purpose (at least not the objects I buy.) So, I try to model my web apps the same way. Some of the greatest websites are the simplistically functional (check out dictionary.com if you’re looking for a great, recent example how simplicity can improve usability.) I absolutely encourage experimentation and the sharing of ideas and blogs are a great medium to accomplish this. So, by all means, let me know what you think about this issue. I’m not trying to keep anyone from doing cool things, but I am trying to keep the largest number of users in mind.

Currently Rocking Out To: Goodnight and Go - Imogen Heap